The Straits Times says

Tackling inequality resolutely

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Members of Parliament were right to flag the risks of widening income gaps during the Budget debate. Inequality can be perpetuated even in societies priding themselves on distributing rewards according to merit. The paradox of meritocracy is that the elite often fail to take a closer look at meritocratic practices that exclude certain groups and reward only those with achievements attained as a result of socio-economic advantages. Such a system makes those who grow up in poorer households feel like failures for not achieving as much as their privileged peers. Nominated MP Kok Heng Leun was right to say Singapore must find ways to make its system more equitable, and to provide timely help to those in need.

One way is through policy intervention to guard against brand-name schools becoming in effect closed circles that deny others a chance to gain admission, and contribute to "inbreeding". Such environments work against efforts to give students a broad world view and social ease when mixing with different groups. A recent Institute of Policy Studies study on social capital found that those who attended elite schools had few friends from non-elite institutions.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on March 14, 2018, with the headline Tackling inequality resolutely . Subscribe