Should we tinker with human blueprints?

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Sometimes the future arrives in waves, advancing abruptly and then withdrawing. Last week, a Chinese researcher named He Jiankui announced that he had successfully altered the genetic code of a pair of twin girls born last month. He said that while they were still embryos, he had edited the babies' genes to make them resistant to HIV infection, but he offered few further details.

Scientists and bioethicists worldwide were incensed by Dr He's announcement, given serious concerns about the danger the still-developing technology could pose to humans. Jennifer Doudna, a researcher at the University of California at Berkeley who helped develop the gene-editing technique known as Crispr, said she was "deeply disappointed" and "a bit horrified" by what Dr He had done, adding that his intervention was not medically necessary and breached international guidelines on the use of gene-editing technology.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on December 05, 2018, with the headline Should we tinker with human blueprints?. Subscribe