Impeachment isn't the remedy for Trump's misdeeds

PHOTO: NYTIMES
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

The opening of an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's conduct has sent Americans scrambling to divine meaning from the two previous impeachments in our history. In both cases - Andrew Johnson in 1868 and then Bill Clinton in 1998 - a House of the opposite party impeached the president, only to see the Senate acquit largely along party lines.

At present, many observers expect a similar result for Mr Trump: impeachment by the Democratic majority in the House with acquittal by the Republican-controlled Senate. With his party controlling the Senate, and Republican base voters still strongly supporting him, Mr Trump appears to be insulated against removal from office.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on October 03, 2019, with the headline Impeachment isn't the remedy for Trump's misdeeds. Subscribe