For the lawyers who ply their trade in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the ability to read the mind of Judge Richard Seeborg would be extremely useful.
Until a few years ago, trying to predict how he or any other judge might rule depended on encountering them enough times in court, or exchanging tips with colleagues on which arguments the judge had recently found persuasive.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Read the full story and more at $9.90/month
Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month
ST One Digital
$9.90/month
No contract
ST app access on 1 mobile device
Unlock these benefits
All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com
Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device
E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you