I am dismayed by the antics of some employers who try to take advantage of students in part-time jobs.
A family member found a part-time position with a local company in the food sector. He was informed that his 12-day work stint would not be entitled to Central Provident Fund (CPF) contribution as he is still a student, and could be considered only as a casual worker.
According to CPF regulations, any Singaporean earning more than $50 a month engaged under a contract of service - casual, part-time or full-time - is entitled to CPF contribution.
It was only when I insisted that the CPF contribution be paid that the company agreed to do so.
I believe many part-time workers are facing the same issue, especially during this pandemic period when jobs could be scarce.
Cash payment for work done will most likely be offered in lieu of CPF contribution. Part-timers are among the lowest rungs of workers in Singapore, with no union protection. They deserve fair treatment and remuneration after a day of hard work.
Employers must realise that a fairly compensated worker is a happy worker. And a happy worker is a productive asset to a company.
Foo Sing Kheng
LETTERS OF THE WEEK
Go to www.straitstimes.com to see this week’s top picks.
If you spot something interesting, take a picture and send it to firstname.lastname@example.org together with a detailed caption and your comments, and we can consider publishing it. Our guidelines on Forum letters apply.
Letters should be for exclusive publication in The Straits Times. Letters to be considered for the following day’s publication must reach Forum by 1pm and must include the writer’s full name, address and phone number. The Forum Editor reserves the right to edit the letters. E-mail your letter to email@example.com