In some respects, the United States Supreme Court's decision on Tuesday rejecting challenges to President Donald Trump's travel ban was highly predictable.
Mr Trump issued his series of executive orders under the authority of a breathtakingly broad statute - specifically, Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act - a provision designed to forestall national security threats. And he issued it for two plausible reasons: the proliferation of international terrorism threats against the US and the seeming inadequacy of overseas screening of would-be travellers to the US by some countries. Given this context, the decision is hardly surprising.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Read the full story and more at $9.90/month
Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month
ST One Digital
$9.90/month
No contract
ST app access on 1 mobile device
Unlock these benefits
All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com
Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device
E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you