Anti-foreign interference Bill - a sharper tool for the digital age

A rebuttal to points raised about over-broad language and restrictions on courts’ role

The building housing the Supreme Court of Singapore. The writers disagree with an earlier article in The Straits Times on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act that said the anti-foreign interference Bill “restricts the role of the Singapore courts to review the legality of the Government’s exercise of powers”. ST PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

We refer to the article "Anti-foreign interference Bill - 3 areas of concern" by Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh Nehal in The Straits Times on Tuesday. We wish to share our perspectives on the subject and respond to some of the points he makes.

Mr Singh makes two primary points in his articulation of concerns about the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act (Fica).

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.