Why 60 is the new 40

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Today's 60-year-old cannot be compared with the sexagenarian of our mothers' generation for one reason: phenotypical age, which is the age of the body as opposed to the chronological age of a person.

Last year, researchers at King's College London who examined two groups of endurance cyclists - those aged 55 to 79 and those in their 20s - found these two groups had the same immune systems, strength and muscle mass, and they could not tell participants' ages by looking at the physiology reports but only when they came face to face with them. They followed 125 long-distance cyclists, some now in their 80s, and found they had the immune systems of 20-year-olds. In March last year, Professor Norman Lazarus, 82, who also took part in and co-authored the research, was found to have the immune system of a 20-year-old, thanks to a regimen of regular exercise.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on July 14, 2019, with the headline Why 60 is the new 40. Subscribe