More say by minority shareholders does not always mean better decisions

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Due either to weak investor protection or legitimate business reasons, ownership of publicly listed companies in many markets - Argentina, Greece, Italy, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and mainland China, for example - is highly concentrated in the hands of one or a few controlling shareholders.

Because controlling shareholders typically have control power over firms significantly in excess of their cash flow rights, primarily through the use of pyramids and participation in management, they have a direct conflict of interest with minority shareholders.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on April 29, 2018, with the headline More say by minority shareholders does not always mean better decisions. Subscribe