Four lessons for investors in wake of Hyflux's fall

In its case, like for Ezra and Swiber, investors who sought high yields ended up losing big

Companies whose total liabilities amount to less than 40 per cent of their total assets are safer than those whose ratios are 60 per cent and above, says the writer. In Hyflux's case, for most of the past 10 years, that ratio was above 60 per cent. I
Companies whose total liabilities amount to less than 40 per cent of their total assets are safer than those whose ratios are 60 per cent and above, says the writer. In Hyflux's case, for most of the past 10 years, that ratio was above 60 per cent. In the financial year ended 2017, it was 72 per cent. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO READER
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Hyflux is the latest case in which investors who sought high yields ended up losing a huge chunk of their capital.

Not too long ago, we saw this happening to investors in the securities of Ezra Holdings and Swiber Holdings.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Sunday Times on March 10, 2019, with the headline Four lessons for investors in wake of Hyflux's fall. Subscribe