UN experts urge Indian authorities to cease ‘use of excessive force’ to curb protests
Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments
UN experts said demonstrators in the India protests had sustained injuries and some reported being subjected to ill-treatment.
PHOTO: REUTERS
- UN experts urged India to stop “use of excessive force” against protests and called for an independent investigation into injuries, ill-treatment and mass detentions.
- They said police used lathi charges on unarmed students, blocked thousands from joining, and should end assembly bans, biometrics surveillance and internet disruptions.
- The protests centre on a voter list revision that opponents say removed 130 million names and hurt poor people and Muslims; the BJP and Election Commission deny bias.
AI generated
WASHINGTON – UN experts called on Oct 20 for an independent investigation into Indian authorities’ conduct in a recent crackdown on protests, where they said demonstrators had sustained injuries and some reported being subjected to ill-treatment.
Opposition political parties and student organisations have held protests in October in India demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation over a revision of voter lists that they say favours Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
“Despite the non-violent nature of the assemblies, law enforcement agencies have reportedly deployed force against unarmed students, including lathi charges, and have prevented thousands from joining the protests,” the two dozen experts said in a statement, referring to batons used to break up crowds.
“We call on the authorities to immediately cease the use of excessive force, rescind blanket assembly bans and refrain from the misuse of digital surveillance, including through biometrics and internet disruptions,” they said.
The Indian embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment. India’s government said in October the country’s law enforcement acted “strictly in accordance with the law”.
India has repeatedly dismissed such criticism and cast it as interference in the country’s internal affairs, including when the UN human rights office earlier in October expressed concerns over mass detentions in relation to the latest protests.
Protesting groups say the removal of 130 million names from voter lists led to eligible voters being disenfranchised, which disproportionately affected poor and homeless people as well as ethnic minorities including Muslims, who are unlikely to vote for the Hindu nationalist BJP. The BJP and India’s Election Commission deny this.
The Election Commission says it was removing duplicate, deceased, shifted and otherwise ineligible voters and that anyone excluded in error can pursue appeals.
The protest crackdown has been condemned by human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
UN experts are appointed by the UN Human Rights Council to monitor and document specific human rights crises, but are independent of the organisation itself. REUTERS