White House plays down Rouhani crowing on nuclear deal

Mr Hassan Rouhani's comment, on his official Twitter account, played into complaints of hawkish members of the US Congress that the deal, due to come into force on Jan 20, gave too much up to Iran for too little in return. "Our relationship w/ t
Mr Hassan Rouhani's comment, on his official Twitter account, played into complaints of hawkish members of the US Congress that the deal, due to come into force on Jan 20, gave too much up to Iran for too little in return. "Our relationship w/ the world is based on Iranian nation's interests. In #Geneva agreement world powers surrendered to Iranian nation's will," the tweet said. -- FILE PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The White House on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014, dismissed an aggressive claim of victory by Iran's President Hassan Rouhani over an interim nuclear deal, and attempted to face down rising domestic political pressure over the pact.

Washington said Mr Rouhani's comment that world powers were now bowing to Teheran was a symptom of domestic politics and insisted the deal, curbing aspects of Iran's nuclear programme in return for limited sanctions relief, hinged on its words and not its rhetoric.

"It is not surprising to us and nor should it be surprising to you that the Iranians are describing the agreement in a certain way towards their domestic audience," spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.

"It does not matter what they say, it matters what they do."

Mr Rouhani's comment, on his official Twitter account, played into complaints of hawkish members of the US Congress that the deal, due to come into force on Jan 20, gave too much up to Iran for too little in return.

"Our relationship w/ the world is based on Iranian nation's interests. In #Geneva agreement world powers surrendered to Iranian nation's will," the tweet said.

The White House is fighting a battle to prevent Congress from slapping a new round of sanctions on Iran which it says could cause the Islamic republic to walk away from the negotiating table, and eventually push Washington into a war to thwart Teheran's nuclear programme.

Supporters of tightened sanctions say they have at least 59 votes in the 100-seat Senate and may be heading towards the 67-vote threshold needed to override the veto that President Barack Obama has promised. There is also strong backing for new sanctions in the House of Representatives.

Some lawmakers have been irked by White House warnings that voting for new sanctions could unleash a train of events that could lead to war with Iran.

Senate Majority leader Harry Reid has so far declined to bring the sanctions Bill to the floor, noting that 10 key Democratic committee chairs have called on him to thwart the passage of any measures that could scupper the nuclear diplomacy.

Mr Reid spoke a day after Obama publicly called on lawmakers to hold off on new sanctions to avoid disrupting his nuclear diplomacy - taking place after more than three decades of Cold War-style antagonism between the Islamic republic and a nation it derides as the "Great Satan".

Lawmakers who support the Bill say tough sanctions brought Iran to the negotiating table and stiffer measures would increase Mr Obama's leverage in talks between Teheran and the P5+1 group of world powers.

The new measures target the petroleum, mining and engineering sectors of Iran's economy, but supporters say they would only come into force if Teheran stops negotiating in "good faith". Some lawmakers have not taken kindly to warnings from the White House that backing more sanctions was effectively a vote for war.

"I think that is absolutely untrue, an irresponsible assertion, and ought to be clarified and retracted by those who have made it within the administration," said veteran Democratic congressman Steny Hoyer, who nevertheless welcomed the interim deal as a positive step.

The Obama administration is also denying claims that the interim deal reached after weeks of talks in Geneva, included a secret side deal on implementation.

"Let me be very clear: There is no secret agreement here," said State Department spokesman Marie Harf, adding that the terms of the agreement would be released to Congress once Washington had consulted with its partners in the talks.

While the United States and Iran have held direct talks for the first time in decades during a diplomatic thaw triggered by Mr Rouhani's election last year, the foes are still estranged on a string of other geopolitical issues.

Washington on Tuesday registered a sharp protest at a visit by Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, a key player in the nuclear talks, to the grave of Imad Mugniyah, a former leader of the Hezbollah militia in Lebanon.

National Security Council spokesman Caitlin Hayden said that Mugniyah was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people, including Americans.

"The inhumane violence that Mugniyah perpetrated - and that Lebanese Hezbollah continues to perpetrate in the region with Iran's financial and material support - has had profoundly destabilising and deadly effects for Lebanon and the region," Ms Hayden said.

Register here to get free digital access to The Straits Times until Aug 9, 2015.
Comments