UK lawmakers say horsemeat contamination likely fraud

Butcher Sean Basey works behind a "no horsemeat" sign at Bates Butchers in Market Harborough, central England on Feb 20, 2013. The contamination of meat products with horse DNA was most likely due to fraud and prosecutions should be pursued, a second
Butcher Sean Basey works behind a "no horsemeat" sign at Bates Butchers in Market Harborough, central England on Feb 20, 2013. The contamination of meat products with horse DNA was most likely due to fraud and prosecutions should be pursued, a second British parliamentary report into the scandal said on Tuesday. -- FILE PHOTO: AFP

LONDON (REUTERS) - The contamination of meat products with horse DNA was most likely due to fraud and prosecutions should be pursued, a second British parliamentary report into the scandal said on Tuesday.

"The evidence suggests a complex network of companies trading in and mislabelling beef or beef products which is fraudulent and illegal," said Ms Anne McIntosh, a legislator who chairs the cross-party Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, which published the report.

Europe's horsemeat scandal broke in January when traces of horse were found in frozen burgers sold in Irish and British supermarkets, including those run by market leader Tesco, raising questions about the safety of the European food supply chain.

"We are dismayed at the slow pace of investigations and seek assurances that prosecutions will be mounted where there is evidence of fraud or illegality," said Ms McIntosh.

The report was critical of retailers, arguing they should have been more vigilant against the risks of adulteration, especially where meat products were traded many times.

It recommended retailers carry out regular DNA tests on meat and meat-based ingredients which form part of processed or frozen meat products, reporting results to the Food Standards Agency (FSA).

The additional cost of this testing should be borne by retailers and not passed on to consumers, it added.

"Consumers need to know that what they buy is what the label says it is," said Ms McIntosh.

Britain's grocers have responded to the scandal by increasing testing, while Tesco, for example, has pledged to be more open about its supplier base.

FSA CRITICISM

The FSA did not escape criticism from the report.

"There has been a lack of clarity about the responsibility of the FSA in this incident. This must be rectified," the report said, adding the FSA must be seen to be independent of industry and given powers to compel industry and local authorities to carry out food testing.

The report did, however, conclude that the scandal, was not as extensive as originally feared. A study by the same parliamentary committee in February said the contamination discovered by that date was likely to be the "tip of the iceberg".

The new report said testing of processed and frozen beef products sold in Britain since January found horsemeat contamination was limited to a relatively small number of products with more than 99 per cent of those tested found to be free of horse DNA.

It said tests across European Union (EU) member states found 4.66 per cent of products tested contained over 1 per cent horse DNA.

However, in separate EU-mandated tests for the presence of veterinary drug phenylbutazone (bute) in horses slaughtered for human consumption, the United Kingdom had the largest number of positive results.

The committee said a newly introduced system for testing horses for bute before they are released to the food system must continue with government and industry sharing the cost.