No intention to offend, despite dissent charges in Test: Smith

Australian captain Steve Smith defended his team as "nice guys" while admitting he needs to be a better leader. He and Josh Hazlewood were charged with dissent after challenging the umpires during the second Test against New Zealand in Christchurch.
Australian captain Steve Smith defended his team as "nice guys" while admitting he needs to be a better leader. He and Josh Hazlewood were charged with dissent after challenging the umpires during the second Test against New Zealand in Christchurch.PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

CHRISTCHURCH • Australian captain Steve Smith defended his side as "nice guys" yesterday after he was slapped with a dissent charge amid continuing fallout over umpire abuse during the second Test against New Zealand.

Australia won the Test by seven wickets to move to the top of the world rankings, but celebrations were marred by Smith being hauled before the International Cricket Council match referee to explain his actions.

He was charged with dissent in connection with the same obscenity-laden rant that cost Josh Hazlewood 15 per cent of his match fee. The ICC was expected to announce Smith's penalty later yesterday. But Smith talked up the Australians as "nice guys" who play the game hard and push the boundaries but don't mean to offend.

The abuse levelled at the umpires in Christchurch was the latest in a string of incidents involving Australia. Two of the more notable episodes are the notorious 1981 underarm delivery by Trevor Chappell when New Zealand needed six off the last ball to tie an ODI, and in 2013, when then-captain Michael Clarke warned England's Jimmy Anderson to prepare for a broken arm.

"I don't think we're not nice guys. We play a good, hard, aggressive brand of cricket," Smith said, admitting he and Hazlewood were wrong in how they approached the umpires after an lbw appeal against Kane Williamson was turned down.

"For us it's about knowing where that line is and myself and Josh Hazlewood have crossed that line in this Test match and that's not what we're about and hopefully we can learn from that and continue to develop as a team and get better."

Smith said he believed at the time he was acting correctly to question the umpire's decision.

"I thought I was well within my rights to go up to the umpire and ask him why we didn't use the real time snicko(meter)," he said, referring to the technology used to determine if the ball had hit the bat.

"That's deemed to be dissent and I'll cop that on the chin. I need to be better as a leader, I need to set the example and that was not good enough."

Despite the on-field dissent, New Zealand captain Brendon McCullum, who retired from international cricket at the end of the Test, maintained there was a good relationship between the two sides.

"This series has been played in great spirits, I think, and the one back in Australia. I think Steve Smith has been a catalyst for that," he said.

"He plays the game for the right reasons as well. He plays with his heart on his sleeve but he's a very respectful guy and a wonderful cricketer.

"They're No. 1 in the world now and a lot of that is to do with his leadership and (Australian coach) Darren Lehmann's as well."

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on February 25, 2016, with the headline 'No intention to offend, despite dissent charges in Test: Smith'. Print Edition | Subscribe