73 take wrong O-level maths paper

Seventy-three Secondary 5 students - 24 from Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School and 49 from Woodgrove Secondary School - took the O-level maths Paper 1 from the revised syllabus 4048, when they should have been given the paper from the old syllabus 4016.
Seventy-three Secondary 5 students - 24 from Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School and 49 from Woodgrove Secondary School - took the O-level maths Paper 1 from the revised syllabus 4048, when they should have been given the paper from the old syllabus 4016.ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA
According to SEAB, the topics examined in the O-level maths Paper 1 for the revised syllabus 4048 are largely comparable with the old syllabus 4016. After realising the mix-up, the two schools immediately informed SEAB to ensure students took the mat
According to SEAB, the topics examined in the O-level maths Paper 1 for the revised syllabus 4048 are largely comparable with the old syllabus 4016. After realising the mix-up, the two schools immediately informed SEAB to ensure students took the maths Paper 2 the next day under the correct syllabus.ST PHOTO: LAU FOOK KONG

Two schools 'indicated wrong syllabus code' during registration

More than 70 students from two schools took the wrong O-level mathematics paper last Thursday, after a mix-up in the subject codes during registration.

A total of 73 Secondary 5 students - 24 from Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School (AISS) and 49 from Woodgrove Secondary School - were affected. They had taken the O-level maths Paper 1 from the revised syllabus with the subject code 4048, when they should have been given the paper from the old syllabus with the code 4016.

During the exam, students came across a few questions they were unfamiliar with. They later realised that the paper they had taken was different from the one they had studied for, after comparing the subject code on their entry proofs with that of their 10-year series.

The Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board (SEAB) confirmed the mix-up yesterday but said no other schools were affected.

The revised version is being examined for the first time this year.

FAIR RESPONSE TO MIX-UP

We will take into consideration the circumstances of the incident, the candidates’ performance in the school preliminary examination, their performance in the other mathematics paper and the cohort’s performance in providing a fair assessment to the candidates for the mathematics subject.

SINGAPORE EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT BOARD

The Straits Times understands that the current Secondary 5 Normal (Academic) students are using the old maths syllabus as they started a year earlier than the Secondary 4 Express students, who are on the new syllabus.

The SEAB said both schools "had indicated the wrong syllabus code during the registration process" in the early part of the year.

While affected candidates have taken the Paper 1 for the revised syllabus 4048, the topics examined are largely comparable with the syllabus 4016, it said.

After the schools learnt of the error, they immediately informed SEAB to ensure that the students took the maths Paper 2 the next day under the correct syllabus.

SEAB is currently working with the schools and the University of Cambridge International Examinations to ensure that "these candidates will be fairly assessed" in the maths Paper 1 exam.

"We will take into consideration the circumstances of the incident, the candidates' performance in the school preliminary examination, their performance in the other mathematics paper and the cohort's performance in providing a fair assessment to the candidates for the mathematics subject," it said.

  • 49

    Number of students from Woodgrove Secondary School who sat the wrong paper

    24

    Number of students from Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School who did likewise

Some AISS students said they were shocked when they found out they had taken the wrong paper.

"I didn't think this would happen," said a student who declined to be named. "There's probably little difference between the papers. Hopefully I won't be penalised."

On candidates' performance in preliminary exams being considered for assessment, the student said: "I think it is quite unfair, because we put in a lot more effort preparing for the O levels."

AISS principal Chew Ing Lim said: "Our immediate focus is to provide the necessary support to the students who are still in the midst of taking the national examinations... The students have been encouraged to stay focused."

Woodgrove principal Chee Chit Yeng said the affected students "have been briefed, and their parents have been assured that they will be assessed together with the other candidates under the correct syllabus and would not be disadvantaged".

"The school is reviewing its registration processes to ensure such mistakes will not happen in future," he added.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on October 25, 2016, with the headline '73 take wrong O-level maths paper'. Print Edition | Subscribe