Mother defends daughter against claims that the teen lied about being sexually abused by her father

A 40-year-old mother defended her teenage daughter against claims that she had lied about being sexually abused by her father.
A 40-year-old mother defended her teenage daughter against claims that she had lied about being sexually abused by her father.PHOTO: ST FILE

SINGAPORE - A mother on Wednesday (Nov 16) defended her teenage daughter against claims that she had lied about being sexually abused by her father, a 42-year-old food stall assistant.

Taking the stand as a prosecution witness, the 40-year-old mother revealed how for three weeks, she agonised over whether to go to the police and report the accused, her husband then.

This was after her daughter, aged 13 at the time and the eldest of her three children, had claimed that he had sexually abused her.

"I was still in a shocked state and I needed time to gather my thoughts and to weigh the pros and cons," she told the High Court.

When Deputy Public Prosecutor Amanda Chong asked what pros and cons, she replied: "Nobody wants a broken family," she said, adding that she needed to speak to the rest of her family.

 

The accused is on trial for sexually abusing his biological daughter between the end of 2011 and April 2014, when she was between 11 and 13 years old.

He has pleaded not guilty to 10 charges for various sexual offences, including four for sexual assault by penetration.

The mother was having dinner at home on April 16, 2014, when she received a text message from her daughter revealing the alleged abuse. When the words sank in 12 minutes later, the administrative assistant sent a reply to her daughter: "I love you, you have me always."

In the exchange of messages over the WhatsApp messaging app, she asked the girl to swear that she was telling the truth. When the girl returned home, she again questioned the girl.

"She cried very badly," the woman said.

The next day, she kicked her husband out of the flat. Three weeks later she made a police report and filed for divorce.

In cross-examination, defence counsel Siaw Kin Yeow pointed out that in the woman's text conversation with her daughter, nowhere did she show concern for the girl's welfare or ask for details of what had actually happened.

The lawyer put it to her that the text messages were a "fabrication".

"Your daughter did not suffer any sexual assault by your husband," he contended.

"I disagree!" the woman exclaimed, raising her voice.

She also testified that her eldest daughter would go into the master bedroom three times a week to use the computer for school work, while her husband was inside.

A few times, the door was locked when she tried to open it. She said she left it as that as she did not want to disturb her daughter doing her school work.

She said she could not recall her daughter's reaction as she left the bedroom after being alone with the accused.

At the time, she did not have any marital problems with the accused, apart from quarrels over financial issues as he was "not keen to get a stable job".

The woman was also questioned by the prosecutor about the size of her husband's genitals and their sexual relationship.

Part of the defence's case is that it was impossible for the accused, who has undergone penis enlargement surgery, to have had sex with his daughter.

The trial continues.