Print Article
>> Back to the article
April 26, 2008
Handling of service complaints should be improved
I REFER to the article, 'Unhappy with service? For most, it's talk only, no action' (April 21). The reason that I no longer lodge complaints in Singapore is that, almost without exception, the often tedious process of lodging a complaint and the wholly ineffective way in which it is likely to be handled is infinitely more frustrating than the original incidence of sub-standard service.

Take Cold Storage, for example. After their cashiers broke two of my debit cards within a week by forcing them too roughly through the slots on the till machines and thus rendering them unusable, the second incident reducing the cashier into peels of laughter, I complained through the Cold Storage website. I was later contacted by the store manager who offered me the inspirational piece of advice that, since the cards were broken, I should 'replace it with a new one'.

Or Delifrance? They recently sold me a product as vegetarian which, upon consumption, contained ham. Although I later received an apology, I was told in my initial contact with them that ham was, in fact, pork and not considered vegetarian, a fact which I have been aware of for many years now.

Few services in Singapore are more sub-standard than the handling of service complaints.

Steve Armstrong

Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Condition of Access