The inherent tensions in debate on foreign workers

What's good for business, the economy and the national interest are not perfectly aligned

Being "open", as Singaporeans pride ourselves on being, does not mean unfettered openness is an unalloyed good and the best strategy for all parties, times and places - that would be answering to ideology, not the pragmatism on which we also pride ou
Being "open", as Singaporeans pride ourselves on being, does not mean unfettered openness is an unalloyed good and the best strategy for all parties, times and places - that would be answering to ideology, not the pragmatism on which we also pride ourselves, says the writer. ST PHOTO: JASON QUAH
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

Resolution of the current debate about jobs for Singaporean versus foreign professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) requires explicit recognition that the needs and interests of business, the economy and the nation are not, and will never be, perfectly aligned - here or anywhere else in the world.

Hence, choices will inevitably have to be made between alternative policies that entail different costs and benefits for different entities, groups and individuals.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on September 04, 2020, with the headline The inherent tensions in debate on foreign workers. Subscribe