Khmer Rouge trials should spur reforms
Published on Aug 16, 2014 6:54 AM
The double sorrow of Cambodia's "killing fields" lies in the four years of unrelenting genocide which ended in 1979 and the 35 subsequent years of deferred justice. What closure that was brought about recently was so little and so late that many younger Cambodians barely reacted when the two most senior surviving leaders of the murderous Khmer Rouge regime were finally found guilty of crimes against humanity by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.
Execution and torture, combined with widespread starvation and disease, killed 1.7 million Cambodians, nearly a quarter of the population, when the Khmer Rouge seized power. The sheer vastness of the tragedy called for a determined and speedy response from the United Nations-backed court that started the work of investigating the war crimes in 2006, after much foot-dragging over nine years.
Yet, there have been only three convictions in all - arising from Case 001 and Case 002 - despite more than US$200 million (S$249 million) poured in by international donors to help ensure that Khmer Rouge atrocities did not go unanswered. The weak operations of the Phnom Penh-based court, systematic corruption of Cambodian staff, and official obstructionism make for sorry reading. International judges have resigned, disillusionment is affecting the further contribution of funds, and potential defendants have died or have been declared unfit to stand trial.
What time remains for the tribunal to continue functioning should be used by Cambodians to ponder the wrenching deficiencies that surfaced and the critiques of international observers on the weak rule of law that generally exists.
To continue reading, log in if you are a subscriber
If you are not a subscriber, you can get instant, unlimited access here