Andy Ho, Senior Writer
Pay women alimony for 'love labour'
Published on May 16, 2014 4:59 PM
A JUDGE recently questioned the right that every woman has to seek maintenance or alimony at divorce.
Justice Choo Han Teck thought that this "unalloyed right" spoke to "patronising gestures" in the law called the Women's Charter that "belie deep chauvinistic thinking".
He rejected the request of a woman, a 48-year-old regional sales manager of a multinational firm, for $120,000 in alimony from her former husband, a 47-year-old senior prison officer after their 10-year marriage ended in 2012. She earned slightly more than him.
The judge hoped that Parliament might someday amend or replace the current law with a broader one fairer to the genders.
To continue reading, log in if you are a subscriber
If you are not a subscriber, you can get instant, unlimited access here
Alimony can be seen as an entitlement, not a handout. That is, it is simply money that the man owes the woman because of her manifold investments in the marriage.