-
Just a minute
The good
1. The relatively inexperienced freelance writers Dawn Lim - writing under her pen name Virginia Who - and Bell Tan, and full-time photographer Khoo Guo Jie have put together a book that is winning in its earnestness. It helps, of course, that they were guided along by the experienced graphic designer Yanda Tan.
Khoo's fresh take on old Singapore buildings and Tan's neat and understated matte treatment of these will likely transport anyone who knew these buildings in their heyday back to the past.
2. Lim, the book's editor and lead writer, is a trained architect, but does not use the jargon of her profession. Being at once clear, succinct and deep is an art and Lim is on her way to achieving that.
3. The writers have thought to reproduce two seminal essays on the developmentof architecture in Singapore. The first is by pioneering architect William Lim and the second is from his peer Alfred Wong. Both give essential context as to how the 40 buildings featured in the book came about and also ask hard questions about the direction Singapore might want to take in the future.
The bad
1. This book is part of the Singapore Memory Projectto capture the essence of what has made Singapore Singapore in the past half century. With this nostalgic brief in mind, the reader will be stumped to see that not one photograph in the book has people in it. Lead photographer Khoo, who snapped about 60 per cent of the shots for the book, had submitted a good number of photographs with people milling about the featured buildings.
2. There is no excuse for sloppy proofreading and poor grammar, especially in a book with a national remit.
The iffy
1. Lim and Tan sought to interview people whose lives revolve around the featured buildings. Alas, they were not able to draw out their interviewees enough to yield insights, or even a single quotable quote.
The reader is left with the most pedestrian responses, most of which are attributed to "Anonymous". Do something well, or not at all.
-
FIVE QUESTIONS THIS BOOK ANSWERS
1. How is Singapore more fortunate than other global cities with its skyline today?
2. Why do architects working in Singapore have a heavier burden than those designing in larger countries?
3. Why have Singaporeans with deep pockets long preferred foreign architects to home-grown ones?
4. What happens when you prefer style over substance?
5. When is nostalgia unhelpful?
-
Join the conversation on Wednesday
Regulars of The Big Read Meet enjoy the lively, enlightening discussions that are its hallmark.
But why take our word for it?
Join senior writer Cheong Suk-Wai on Wednesday at 6.30pm to discuss American sociologist and psychologist Sherry Turkle's new book, Reclaiming Conversation. It will be held at the Central Public Library, B1, National Library Board headquarters, 100 Victoria Street.
Sign up at any NLB e-Kiosk or go to www.nlb.gov.sg/golibrary, look for The Big Read Meet and follow the steps there.
Meanwhile, Sunday Times readers have written in with their thoughts on Turkle's book:
Singaporean Lee Teck Chuan, 50, a lecturer in finance, says: "We delude ourselves into multitasking but, at the same time, preach mindfulness. We forget to live and lose touch with those familiar to us, unless they get in touch with us through our digital gadgets.
"These gadgets supposedly liberate us from old ways of doing tiresome chores. But have we found what we want to do with the resulting extra time? Perhaps not. We think little of being here and worry constantly about being elsewhere."
Belgian economist Bart Remes, 50, a Singapore permanent resident of 15 years, says: "Technology has improved our standard of living. It has also changed how we communicate and - this is often overlooked - what we communicate. For example, when Stamford Raffles sent his daughter Ella Sophia back to England from Singapore, the voyage was not without its dangers and took approximately three months. News of her return would take another three months or so to reach him and was likely longer than today's usual SMS of "Okay".
The easier and faster we communicate, the less importance we attach to content. The speed of our reply becomes more important than the actual content.
"And this is sad because the good things in life cannot be hurried, but one tends to put pressure on others by hurrying them when they need not be hurried."