ST: What about you, Yuni? When you found yourself as a woman heading the festival, a few months after Susie's appointment, did it surprise you?
Hadi: I had worked at the festival before and there had been talk about the festival coming back for a while, but it happened quickly. For me, if I feel fear, I know that's the right thing for me to do, so I will jump in and swim. Of course, you don't 100 per cent know whether you can do it because you haven't done it before, but the only way to know is to take it on.
Lingham: "You don't 100 per cent know" is exactly how I felt. But what you said about leading as a woman, I don't see myself as leading in that sense at all. So if people see me as a role model, I'd be surprised - I don't see myself as a role model. (Both laugh)
ST: Did you face any challenges early on?
Hadi: The main challenges were rebuilding trust with the community and overseas film-makers and understanding where we were in the landscape since the absence of the festival. Because of the different political situations in the countries surrounding us, film festivals in South-east Asia have come and gone, so we had to identify what kind of space we could occupy, what that meant to us and not chase only the obvious, which is big films or big directors.
We've had to look at basic things, such as the quality of the films and stories that we're interested to showcase, and then build new initiatives such as the Southeast Asian Film Lab, which supports people making their first features, and the youth jury and critics programme for tertiary students to watch films from South-east Asia, write about them and vote for the Youth Jury Prize.
Lingham: I also thought about what SAM is beyond Singapore because for the last 18 years, it has had to be a place that South-east Asian artists look to to represent them. And with the Biennale, we did weave tighter relationships with artists from far-flung places other than the capital cities. So as I crafted a new vision, with the help of the museum's board, the tagline became "contemporary art" first, not "South-east Asian art"; and contemporary art in South-east Asia - not "of", but "in" - so Singapore can stand for what contemporary art is around the world too.
ST: It is interesting that both of you had to work out what your organisations mean, not just for Singapore, but also South-east Asia.
Hadi: It's difficult for good Southeast Asian films to travel to other countries because of language barriers, and a big star in Thailand may not be a big star in Indonesia because they haven't discovered each other yet. The idea is that if we can reach out further, share that information and give people opportunities to watch the films, they will see that the language barriers disappear because we have a lot in common. And when the film-makers come together, they realise that.
Lingham: Do the South-east Asian film-makers see Singapore as an important, neutral ground on which they can meet?
Hadi: I think so. When we have the film festival, film-makers do come on their own, and they were happy last year that we returned and they could come together as friends. But the first step is always your own country, you can only plant the seed and take the next step and see where it goes.
In the absence of the festival, a lot of things changed. Now, Singapore film-makers may think of premiering their films overseas, instead of at the Singapore International Film Festival. We can't make people premiere their films at the festival just because it is the national film festival, it should be because they feel it is the best choice, and we have to raise our standards to convince them it is the best choice. At the end of the day, the programming speaks for itself.
Lingham: Singapore is a very small place and we will have to take care of our own first, but we can't simply stay there, we have to make sure that Singapore artists are also working with other people and challenging themselves. With the Singapore Biennale 2013, people looked at SAM as that - the place where these things can happen and open up relational ties. This was a lot harder maybe 10 years ago, because there was a lot of criticism and questioning of Singapore's intentions.
ST: As organisations that function on the national level but remain autonomous, how do you navigate that space?
Lingham: This is new for Singapore, allowing a national museum to unmoor. It's going to be an experiment of sorts because all the museums used to be part of NHB and they had processes that were shared. For the last 18 years, when SAM was a statutory board, whatever it put up did not have to go through the Media Development Authority and now it does; this independence is a double-edged sword.
Hadi: Most film festivals receive a large amount of government funding, so it's not unusual. For us, it's trying to balance whatever restrictions that are put on us with creating a space where we can still have a voice and unique identity. If Singapore wants a top-level film festival, we must acknowledge that these festivals around the world present the most cutting-edge directors and films, and that includes things that may be objectionable in Singapore. We hope to be that space, where we can present any of these films, because it is in the context of the festival and presented as an art form. If our partners can understand what our role is and we can put that across in a way that they understand as well, then more great things will come.
ST: Looking ahead then, is there anything about Singapore's art or film scene that excites you?
Lingham: For me, the excitement is there if we take the tide as it is turning and build expertise so we become the place people make their pilgrimage to, that they come here instead of us always having to refer and defer like we haven't arrived. It's not about arriving per se, but being that whirlpool. When I see Singapore artists still looking to overseas residencies as the highlights of their existence and always referring to an aesthetic that is not thought through, I want them to sense that the tide is turning.
Hadi: Many films are being made and there are now a lot of first- and second-time film-makers, so the question is: how do we move on from here? No one has the answer yet, but it is bringing us together as a community and removing barriers; it's not "you make arthouse" and "I make commercial". And that's interesting because we can look at the kinds of films we're making, instead of just thinking along the lines of genres. In terms of audience, when the festival returned last year, people were not afraid to ask questions and they were interested in the process. We have moved beyond basic questions like what is your inspiration, or what is your budget.
Lingham: Or how long did it take to make this.
Hadi: Yeah. There is a level of sophistication, which is due to many factors, including easy access to information, and we can now discuss the art form, the idea, the storytelling.