I agree that there is a stereotype that the O-level track is inferior to the Integrated Programme (IP) track ("The O-level track of shame"; Feb 4).

Schools have great power to influence. They should be more open about their students' progress and the tracks they offer.

If schools choose to keep their O-level tracks in the dark, they directly fuel the stereotype that it is a shameful path to take.

It is important for the public to understand that the superiority of the IP is overhyped.

Coming from a dual-track secondary school, I have found that it is common for students in the O-level track to get results that surpass those of IP students.

Students can thrive only in a learning track that is most suitable for them. Being in the O-level track instead of the IP does not mean they are getting a bad deal.

I hope schools will start highlighting both tracks in their Open House and emphasise each track's benefits.

This will, no doubt, benefit the students and return glory to the O-level track.

Rachel Loh Si Ning, 15,

Year 3 Integrated Programme student

CALLING YOUNG READERS:

If you are 21 or below and want to air your opinion on any article or letter in The Straits Times, e-mail your letter to stforum@sph.com.sg, with the header "Voices of Youth". Do include your age, educational level and contact details, and the headline of the article/letter you refer to.