Sph Website
 
THE AWARD-WINNING WEBSITE: BEST IN ONLINE MEDIA (GOLD) - WAN-IFRA ASIA DIGITAL MEDIA AWARDS 2012
Singapore weather
25 °C
 -
33°C
 

Organic food no more nutritious than non-organic food: Study

 
Published on Sep 04, 2012
2:44 PM
This March 16, 2011, file photo shows organic radishes at the Pacifica Farmers Market in Pacifica, California. Patient after patient asked: Is eating organic food, which costs more, really better for me? Unsure, Stanford University doctors dug through reams of research to find out and concluded there's little evidence that going organic is much healthier, citing only a few differences involving pesticides and antibiotics. -- PHOTO: AP

(REUTERS) - Organic produce and meat typically isn't any better for you than conventional food when it comes to vitamin and nutrient content, although it does generally reduce exposure to pesticides and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, according to a United States (US) study.

"People choose to buy organic foods for many different reasons. One of them is perceived health benefits," said Dr Crystal Smith-Spangler, who led a team of researchers from Stanford University and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care. "Our patients, our families ask about, 'Well, are there health reasons to choose organic food in terms of nutritional content or human health outcomes?'"

She and her colleagues reviewed more than 200 studies that compared either the health of people who ate organic or conventional foods or, more commonly, nutrient and contaminant levels in the foods themselves.

The foods included organic and non-organic fruits, vegetables, grains, meat, poultry eggs and milk.

TO READ THE FULL STORY...

 
comments powered by Disqus