BANGKOK (REUTERS) - The leader of a protest group trying to overthrow Thailand's government and scrap planned elections said on Friday the prime minister should either step down or be forced out, and his movement would then need around a year to push through reforms.
Mr Suthep Thaugsuban, a lawmaker who resigned from parliament to lead the protest, and his allies have spoken of a volunteer police force, decentralisation of power and electoral reform - but apart from that have been noticeably short on specifics.
Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has called an election for Feb 2 in an effort to end the street protests but Mr Suthep, knowing that allies of Ms Yingluck's brother, ousted former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, would probably win any election, wants an unelected "people's council" to take over.
Presenting his ideas to the media, Mr Suthep said he would meet military chiefs on Saturday to discuss his strategy, but he rejected any idea of cutting a deal with Ms Yingluck, who heads a caretaker government now that the king has endorsed the election date.
She will hold a forum on Sunday to discuss reforms but says they can only be drawn up and implemented after the election.
"Yingluck's invitations for national reform forums are nothing new. We do not accept Yingluck's offer. We won't negotiate," Mr Suthep told reporters.
Thailand's eight-year political conflict centres on Thaksin, a former telecommunications tycoon popular among the rural poor because of policies pursued when he was in power and carried on by governments allied to him when he was ousted.
Thaksin, who lives in self-imposed exile to escape a jail sentence for abuse of power, gained an unassailable mandate that he used to advance the interests of big companies, including his own. He has dismissed the graft charges as politically motivated.
Ranged against him are a royalist establishment that feels threatened by his rise and, in the past, the military. Some academics see him as a corrupt rights abuser, while the urban middle class resent what they see as their taxes being spent on wasteful populist policies that amount to vote-buying.
They see Ms Yingluck as the puppet of Thaksin, who is thought to determine government policy and has been known to address cabinet meetings by Skype.
"Instead of issuing laws that benefit the people... they have used the parliamentary system in the wrong way to help just one group of people, ... to wash the guilt of Thaksin Shinawatra," Mr Suthep said, referring to a political amnesty bill that acted as a catalyst for the current crisis.
The "soft way out" of the impasse, he said, was for Ms Yingluck to step down and let his council push through reforms. Failing that, the people would simply seize power, he said.
"Once we complete this in 12 to 14 months' time ... everything will return to normal," Mr Suthep said.
The number of protesters on the street has dwindled to just a few thousand from 160,000 on Monday, when Ms Yingluck announced the snap election, but Mr Suthep shows no sign of giving up.
The focus is now on the meeting between the chiefs of the armed forces, Mr Suthep and other interested parties which, according to a statement issued by the military, aims "to find a way out for Thailand".
The politically powerful army has staged or attempted 18 coups in the past 80 years, including the ousting of Thaksin in 2006, and its motives now are unclear. It has declined to get involved in the crisis so far but has offered to mediate.
On Thursday, Mr Suthep sought to drum up support for his plans at a meeting with business leaders, talking of a "people's assembly" of up to 400 members from a cross-section of society.
His protest movement, he said, would get 100 of the seats.
Another front could open up against Ms Yingluck on Friday, when Thailand's corruption watchdog starts a hearing into whether 312 lawmakers from her Puea Thai Party acted illegally in trying to push through a change to the constitution, another spark for the street protests.
The lawmakers voted for a change that would have made the Senate a fully elected body, which was ruled illegal by the Constitutional Court. At present, just under half of the members of the upper house are appointed.
Any case would be pursued by a division of the Supreme Court that has previously delivered rulings that disbanded two parties allied with Thaksin and banned executives from politics for five years.
A ruling could take months, although judgments have been sped up in past crises.