Singapore's Banyan Tree brand of resorts is expanding its canopy.
But as the company - known for discreet luxury, romance and environmental sustainability - does so, it also has had to grapple with less than idyllic scenes: trampled corals and guests urinating into the pristine waters.
Singapore's most successful hotel entrepreneur Ho Kwon Ping, executive chairman of public-listed Banyan Tree Holdings, was refreshingly candid about the challenges from an exploding Chinese tourism market, even as his company embraces the opportunities it presents.
"You know, the outbound Chinese tourism is such a big juggernaut - people cannot do without it - and yet it is a problem when they deal with it," he mused.
The so-called boorish Chinese tourist has become almost a caricature in the trade, posing a dilemma especially for high-end establishments that thrive on a certain image and ambience. An owner of a Paris boutique hotel raised eyebrows in 2012 when he said it would not welcome Chinese tourists.
THE CHINESE TOURIST JUGGERNAUT
The death knell of a hotel is when you have more than 40 per cent of the occupancy coming from one country, unless you are in that country itself.
If you intend to be an international resort such as in Maldives, and 40 per cent are Italians, Germans or Russians, all the rest will feel out of place. Too many people of one nationality actually do adhere to cultural stereotypes. For us, our resort in Maldives has 40 per cent Chinese and at Seychelles, (the trend is) getting stronger.
So you have to try to consciously encourage other markets to come.
S'PORE'S LACK OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP COMPARED TO HONG KONG
We should not be too hard on ourselves. We always talk about how the Hong Kongers have a strong sense of entrepreneurship and they definitely have it far more than Singaporeans. But what is one of the reasons? It's because the social safety net here is so much less. Now, on the flip side, Singaporeans do not need to be so entrepreneurial because we are taken care of.
Here, there is no public housing so everyone scrambles to buy a flat to trade up. So if you are not well off in Hong Kong, you survive by the skin of your teeth or you go under. In Singapore, you won't go under.
HONG KONG'S "ORIGINAL SIN"
The tax that Hong Kongers pay (in the form of high property prices) is actually going into the hands of a few people. Why is it that in Singapore, we don't have these tycoons? How are they making money? All the tycoons here have made their money purely on property.
And that's the original sin - the Hong Kong government could easily have put in a public housing policy but they didn't. They talk about it now but it's a shadow of what we have. They could have easily done it - all the land is owned by the government, they could have auctioned it off.
WARREN BUFFET TYPES IN SINGAPORE VERSUS DONALD TRUMP TYPES IN HONG KONG
The super-rich in Singapore are more self-restrained. Among the wealthy, you have the Warren Buffet types who have different values from the Donald Trump sorts. Singapore has more Warren Buffets and Hong Kong has more Donald Trumps which the people like. I am sure Donald Trump would not be regarded as a hero in Singapore.
Banyan Tree, Mr Ho made clear, "will not turn people away".
As his wife Claire Chiang, who oversees the company's retail arm, quipped: "Whatever price we fix, the Chinese will come. So that is where we have to do the front-line coaching and hopefully... guide people."
Their belief is that "everyone is educatable".
Mr Ho cited an example. Chinese guests at its Maldives resort - many, from cities such as Chengdu, who had never seen the sea - would "buy rubber-soled shoes".
"And they will wait for the tide to go down, then walk over the corals and break all the corals. And our colleagues were aghast," he said.
But he added, "it's not because they want to destroy the corals. It's because they have no understanding".
So the resort started a new protocol: Each time a Chinese group arrived, a Mandarin-speaking host would welcome them and "in a very polite way... educate them about the coral life".
"And once they understand, they are very compliant," said Mr Ho.
"We can't tell them what to do when they don't behave. But I think through osmosis, they will change."
It is an optimistic undertaking, with ever-fresh waves of newly-rich Chinese among the population of 1.3 billion gaining the means to travel.
But belief in the power of education is part of the DNA of the 63-year-old, who is not just a businessman but is also chairman of the Singapore Management University.
In the past year, as the inaugural S.R. Nathan fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, he has also delivered a series of prominent lectures on Singapore's policies and politics, with ideas that range from phasing out the Housing Board's role as a developer to having the Government top up CPF funds for retirement.
The couple were in Hong Kong this month when Mr Ho was conferred an honorary Doctor of Business Administration by the Polytechnic University for his contributions to tourism, education and the broader community.
During an hour-long interview, they held forth on issues ranging from Banyan Tree's succession plans to Hong Kong's politics.
While the main interviewee was Mr Ho, it is clear that Ms Chiang, 64, a former Nominated MP, is his feisty equal in family, business and life.
He deflected some questions to her - for instance, when asked about the number of their projects in China which have encountered delays. She was the one with the numbers on hand (the answer: 10 to 12, out of 65 contracts signed).
She contradicted him - "there are still debutante balls!" - when he sought to make the point that Singapore has moved in a more egalitarian direction.
And when probed about chatter that he could be contemplating a run for the presidency, and if that could be on the cards, he laughed and said: "Ask my wife. Should I?"
Her quick reply: "Unless it's a joint presidency! Half term each."
He added: "Good thing, you know, two for the price of one."
More seriously, he said: "There are lots of people for whom it's a very strong act of public service, and who have been in the realm of public service for a long time. You got to run for office, it's a lot of work."
Not that work is alien to Mr Ho. He is busy rolling out a new brand, Dhawa, a more affordable range of hotels targeting the middle class of newly emerging economies, most notably China.
It is part of the company's plans to double its portfolio of 36 hotels in the next five years, two-thirds of which will be in China.
Yet, the Chinese market is one riven by uncertainties, including political ones.
"We have seen some of the projects, which were supposed to open next year, delayed by a year or so," said Mr Ho. "Some, we see the reverse - nine months after signing, they tell you they have to open, because the party secretary who approved the project is moving on!"
The couple - and the company - have an intimate connection with Hong Kong. Mr Ho was born there, and for four years after they married in 1978 they lived in a village on Lamma Island, for which Banyan Tree is named. They visit often, and count among their friends some of the businessmen there.
Asked if he considers himself a tycoon - a loaded term here, often denoting wealthy, flamboyant magnates wielding outsized influence including over the government - Mr Ho, the son of diplomat-industrialist Ho Rih Hwa, joked about his wine cellar, private jet and Paris chateau.
But the discussion soon veered into one about how Singapore, so often compared to Hong Kong, should look to this city and "see what we need to be careful in protecting".
He decried the "worship of money" in Hong Kong, where the tycoons are idolised as "superheroes because they make so much money", and the love for social status - from titles like "Sir" and "Lord" under the British, to deputies to China's National People's Congress.
At a forum last month, the economics-trained former journalist had said that the biggest challenge to Singapore is whether it will slip into irrelevance by becoming a second-tier global city.
This is a concern mirrored in Hong Kong, where some worry that as the rest of China develops, it would become "just another mainland city".
Asked which city he saw more in danger, Mr Ho did not answer directly, but noted that Hong Kong has challenges, including a lack of cohesion and sense of self-destiny - "who we are as Hong Kong".
Meanwhile, its economy is dominated by a "self-serving property market".
"When we talk about the Pearl River Delta, cities like Zhuhai, Shanghai, what is Hong Kong's relative advantage?"
Correction: An earlier version of the report misquoted Mr Ho Kwon Ping when he talked about the "Donald Trump types". The correct quote should be, "I am sure Donald Trump would not be regarded as a hero in Singapore". We are sorry for the error.