|
THE Prime Minister has rightly said, during Tuesday's deliberations in Parliament, that we should keep things in perspective. The corporate world is replete with examples of CEOs who have resigned, not because they deliberately made mistakes, but because they may have made just one big mistake.
Many had previously made huge profits for the corporations they led. They got top dollar, but they were also very much aware of the risks involved.
Apart from their salaries, their performance bonuses were clearly linked to the risks inherent in their job. Of course, integrity is not the issue - any CEO, minister, civil servant or any employee, for that matter, is expected to be honest, responsible, diligent and perform at an expected level, or even beyond expectations, for which there are often additional rewards.
If 'senior management' of the Home Affairs Ministry are deemed 'not culpable' for any mistake in this saga, it is hoped that, at the very least, they will not receive any performance pay-outs. If granted, these should be significantly reduced, and any promotions withheld for the time being.
I agree with the Prime Minister there should be no witch hunts. There should also not be automatic sacking of every level of management, beginning at the top. However, it must be recognised that sackings or resignations of failed ministers or government officials in many countries are not merely aimed at appeasing an angry public.
These actions reflect an acceptance of the principle, and of the public expectation that ultimately, senior officials must be held responsible, not just those at the bottom of the pecking order.
Lee Siew Pin
|