Web Radio
May 28, 2008
» Midday Update
March 31, 2008 Monday Subscribe today: Print Edition | Online
Home > ST Forum > Story
March 31, 2008
Make medical directive less intrusive for witnesses
RECENTLY, I went to a polyclinic and got a doctor to witness my advance medical directive (AMD). My friend, who was willing to be my witness, had to leave after waiting more than an hour to see the doctor.

When I got to see the doctor, I asked the doctor's nurse to be the second witness. She graciously agreed and asked me to wait outside while they filled in the form.

But there was a problem. While the doctor need only give her office address and telephone number, the nurse had to give her home address and telephone number.

The nurse felt this information was too personal to give to a stranger. She explained her dilemma to me.

I agree fully with the nurse. Why is there a disparity? If the Ministry of Health is serious about the AMD, the conditions for the second witness, especially if he or she is on the staff of the same clinic, should be reviewed. For consistency, the information required should be the same, with no need for personal home address, cellphone or home telephone numbers to be furnished.

I look forward to a more transparent AMD application.

Victor Gomez

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above
Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions