Web Radio
May 28, 2008
» Midday Update

ST Forum
January 18, 2008 Friday
Home > ST Forum > Story
Jan 18, 2008
Doggone it, what a difference a day makes
I REFER to the letter, 'Check expiry date of dog licence' (ST, Jan 16).

I have two dogs and the expiry dates of their licences were sometime in late August and early September last year.

I managed to renew one of the licences online but not the other as I missed the expiry date by one day and the system did not allow me to submit my renewal application. I sent the renewal form and cheque the following day.

The application was rejected as the licence had expired. The reply from the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority indicated that I had to apply for a new licence immediately, and to include a compound fine of $20 for keeping a dog without a valid licence.

The notice was dated Sept 21, 2007, almost three weeks after my submission.

So I submitted the form, certificate of sterilisation and cheque for $34 (licence fee of $14 and $20 compound fine).

I received another notice dated Oct 9, informing me that a copy of the microchip document had not been enclosed and that microchipping is mandatory for all newly licensed dogs, starting from Sept 1.

I wrote in to ask that my dog be exempted from microchipping as this was not an application for a new licence. About two weeks later, I received a reply that my appeal had been turned down, so I got my dog microchipped and re-submitted the documents and the cheque.

My wife wondered if we should have just kept quiet and applied for a new licence for the dog, then perhaps we might not have to pay the fine of $20.

Yes, it is now stated in bold in the new dog-licence notice that no reminder on renewals will be sent.

David Poh Chun Wah

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above
Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions