|
MANY of the points raised by Mr Ivan Kwan ('Commute by sea? It's a ferry tale', ST Online Forum, April 30) make sense.
However, I believe water transport in Singapore deserves further consideration. There are several major canals which have the potential to be developed for commuting purposes.
One is the canal between Bukit Timah and Rochor. Heavy traffic can be seen every morning along Dunearn and Bukit Timah roads.
Another is the canal between northern Singapore and downtown, running through Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Braddell and Toa Payoh, into the Kallang River.
And a third would an extension of Singapore River traffic upstream to River Valley or Ganges roads.
Although much work will be required before these canals can be navigated by shallow-draft boats, one should note that their routes traverse areas with high-density population and link them to downtown and southern parts where most offices are located, and where most ERP gantries have been installed to regulate motor traffic flow.
I understand these canals were built primarily as drainage to prevent flooding, but the only obstacle to deepening them for dual purpose is cost.
Also, waterborne transportat would be an added tourist attraction.
I also notice some of these canals have narrow or no paths. Proper paths beside these canals would offer attractive and safe cycling routes.
I hope the Land Transport Authority will consider these alternatives.
Chen Junyi
|