After gains in the fight against hunger in the 1980s and early 1990s, the number of undernourished people started climbing in 1995, reaching 1.02 billion this year under the combined effect of high food prices and the global financial meltdown. -- PHOTO: AFP
ROME - EVEN before the economic crisis pushed the ranks of the world's hungry to a record 1 billion, declining aid and investment in agriculture had been steadily increasing the number of undernourished people for more than a decade, a UN food agency said on Wednesday.
Why more hungry people
THE world's hungry were hit with a double blow recently. First, soaring prices for food staples
in 2007 and 2008 forced poor families to sell their meager assets and cut down on meals, health and education spending. Although the inflated prices - which caused riots across the globe last year - have stabilised, they remain comparatively high, especially in the developing world.
World economic crisis is increasing unemployment, reducing remittances that immigrants send back home
and making it difficult for poor countries to get credit lines to buy food on the market.
Unless these trends are reversed, ambitious goals set by the international community to slash the number of hungry people by 2015 will not be met, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization warned in a report.
After gains in the fight against hunger in the 1980s and early 1990s, the number of undernourished people started climbing in 1995, reaching 1.02 billion this year under the combined effect of high food prices and the global financial meltdown, the agency said. The figure topped the 1 billion mark in June, and was 963 million a year ago.
The blame for the long-term trend rests largely on the reduced share of aid and private investments earmarked for agriculture over recent years, the Rome-based agency said in its State of Food Insecurity report for 2009.
'In the fight against hunger the focus should be on increasing food production,' FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf said. 'It's common sense ... that agriculture would be given the priority, but the opposite has happened.'
In 1980, 17 per cent of aid contributed by donor countries went to agriculture. That share was down to 3.8 per cent in 2006 and only slightly improved in the last three years, Mr Diouf said in an interview with AP Television News. The decline may have been caused by low food prices that discouraged investment in agriculture and competition for funds from other aid fields including emergency relief, debt reduction and population control, said FAO economist David Dawe. -- AP
